Seabird Group Seabird Group

Predator exclusion fencing improves productivity at a mixed colony of Herring Gulls Larus argentatus, Lesser Black-backed Gulls L. fuscus and Great Black-backed Gulls L. marinus

Sarah A. Dalrymple*

https://doi.org/10.61350/sbj.35.3

* RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL.

Full paper

Abstract

A large multi-species gull colony at South Walney in Cumbria, northwest England, has suffered declines over the past 20 years, and from 2016 to 2020 no gull chicks fledged despite up to 4,000 pairs of adults attempting to breed each year. The primary cause of nest failure was predation. In an attempt to reverse this decline, a predator exclusion fence was erected around the remnant gull colony in March 2021, and population and productivity surveys were carried out over the 2021 and 2022 breeding seasons. In 2021, 53, 27 and 40 chicks fledged from 263 Herring Gull, 186 Lesser Black-backed and 38 Great Black-backed Gull nests, respectively, resulting in reproductive success rates of 0.20, 0.15, and 1.05 fledglings per nest. Following the fence erection, in 2022 numbers of nesting birds increased by 151% overall to 575 Herring Gull nests, 553 Lesser Black-backed Gull nests and 28 Great Black-backed Gull nests, with reproductive success rates of 0.4, 0.61 and 1.21 respectively.

Introduction

Herring Gulls Larus argentatus, Lesser Black-backed Gulls L. fuscus, and Great Black-backed Gulls L. marinus are familiar birds of the coast but are in decline across much of Britain and Ireland.

The Herring Gull population within the United Kingdom was estimated as 130,230 Apparently Occupied Nests (AON) in the Seabird 2000 census (Mitchell et al. 2004), a decline of 13% from the 149,197 AON found in the Seabird Colony Register (1985–88) (Lloyd et al. 1991), which was itself a decline of 48% from the 285,929 AON found in Operation Seafarer (1979 –70) (Cramp et al. 1974).

Lesser Black-backed Gull populations within the United Kingdom showed an increase of 40% in breeding numbers, from 62,321 AON in the Seabird Colony Register (Lloyd et al. 1991) to 87,413 AON in Seabird 2000 (Mitchell et al. 2004). Since 2000, however, there has been evidence of significant declines at natural colonies for this species, including a 98% decline at Orford Ness in southern England between 2001 and 2013, a 46% decline at Skomer, in Wales, between 2000 and 2018, and a 56% decline at neighbouring Skokholm in the same time period, and, at South Walney, a decline of 91% from 19,487 AON in 2000 to 1,981 AON in 2018 (JNCC 2021).

Great Black-backed Gulls showed a small decline in breeding numbers, from 17,415 AON in the Seabird Colony Register (Lloyd et al. 1991) to 16,735 AON in Seabird 2000 (Mitchell et al. 2004). Most birds recorded nested in Scotland; of the 16,735 AON in Seabird 2000, 1,466 AON were in England (Mitchell et al. 2004), with over 50% of the English population nesting on the Isles of Scilly (JNCC 2021).

There are many potential causes of poor breeding success and population declines at gull colonies, including reduction in food sources through closure of landfills (Pons 1992), changes to fisheries discards (Oro et al. 2004), cannibalism (Brown 1967; Camphuysen & Gronert 2010), human disturbance (Robert & Ralph 1975), and predation (Southern et al. 1985; Ellis et al. 2007). Native predators, such as Red Fox Vulpes vulpes (hereafter Fox), can have a serious impact where their populations have increased due to human activities. For example, predator numbers can increase due to additional food source in the form of increased waste or introduced game birds (Delcourt et al. 2022), thereby further exacerbating population declines amongst their prey species. The productivity of Lesser Black-backed and Herring Gull has therefore been shown to decline as Fox sightings increased (Davis et al. 2018).

Predator exclusion fencing has been shown to reduce predation of adult birds, nests, chicks and eggs by mammals in many studies, summarised by literature reviews and meta-analyses (Côté & Sutherland, 1997; Smith et al. 2011; Laidlaw 2021). For example, nest success of Piping Plovers Charadrius relodus was 106% higher when mammalian predators were excluded using 1.1 m tall fencing (Ivan & Murphy, 2005). Furthermore, Minsky (1980) found that excluding Foxes from a colony of Least Terns Sterna albifrons with an electric fence led to an increase in productivity compared to those nests outside the exclusion area, as did Spear et al. (2007), who showed that the daily survival rate of Least Terns increased when an electric fence was erected at nesting sites. A 180 cm high fence with a foot apron and overhang created an effective barrier to feral Cats Felis catus and Foxes, while an electric wire offset further improved the fence efficacy (Moseby & Read, 2006). Robley et al. (2007) also found a fence height of 1.8 m to be most effective to exclude Foxes and feral Cats; they did not, however, find an electric wire addition to the fence to be necessary.

Removal or exclusion of predators is, therefore, an intervention achievable by conservation land managers to improve the breeding success of ground-nesting bird species.

South Walney Nature Reserve comprises the southern end of Walney Island, off the coast of Barrow- in-Furness in Cumbria. It has been managed by Cumbria Wildlife Trust since 1963, and forms part of the South Walney and Piel Flats Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). A colony of Herring Gulls and Lesser Black-backed Gulls inhabit the reserve, as well as smaller numbers of Great Black-backed Gulls, and this gull colony forms a feature of the SSSI and the Morecambe Bay & Duddon Estuary Special Protection Area Special Protection Area.

The colony has experienced several years of low or zero productivity and declines in nesting pairs from 22,750 Herring Gull AON and 18,615 Lesser Black-backed Gull AON in 1974, to 3,218 Herring Gull and 9,489 Lesser Black-backed Gull AON in 2005, down to just 489 AON of Herring Gull and 420 of Lesser Black-backed Gull AON in 2020.

Great Black-backed Gull numbers have also fallen, from a peak of 120 AON in 1998 to 49 AON in 2020 (Cumbria Wildlife Trust, unpublished data). With predation believed to be the main cause of this decline, a permanent predator fence was installed in the winter of 2020/21. This paper assesses the impact on gull productivity in the two years following the installation of this fence.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out in 2021 and 2022 as part of Cumbria Wildlife Trust’s annual monitoring of the South Walney Gull Colony. Funds for the permanent predator exclusion fence was provided by several funders including British Birds Charitable Trust, Tesco Community Grants, FCC Communities, Natural England and the LIFE Programme of the European Union as part of the project LIFE on the Edge: improving the condition and long-term resilience of key coastal SPAs in S, E and NW England (LIFE19 NAT/UK/000964). I extend thanks to Tim Frayling and Bart Donato who provided invaluable help with the fieldwork and gull ringing along with immeasurable amounts of guidance and advice. Additional support was provided by Matt Wood, Ian Hartley, Daniel Piec, Leigh Lock, Chantal Macleod- Nolan, Jake Taylor-Bruce, Paul Waterhouse, Lol Carlyle, and Guy Brooke and staff at Spirit Energy. Without the assistance, support and advice of all of those listed, this work could not have been completed.

References

Brown, R. G. B. 1967. Breeding Success and Population Growth in a Colony of Herring and LesserBlack-backed Gulls Larus argentatus and L. Fuscus. Ibis 109: 502–515. [Crossref]

Camphuysen, K. & Gronert, A. 2010. Breeding biology of Herring Gull Larus argentatus and Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus on Texel (The Netherlands), 2006-2010. Ibis 109: 502–515.

Cook, A. S. C. P. & Robinson, R. A. 2010. How representative is the current monitoring of breeding seabirds in the UK? BTO Research Report No. 573, British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford.

Côté, I. M. & Sutherland, W. J. 1997. The effectiveness of removing predators to protect bird populations. Conservation Biology 11: 395–405. [Crossref]

Cramp, S., Bourne, W. R. P. & Saunders, D. 1974. The seabirds of Britain and Ireland. Collins, London.

Davis, S., Brown, A., Lock, L., Sharps, E., Bolton, M. & Wilson, L. 2018. Productivity of Herring Gulls Larus argentatus and Lesser Black-backed Gulls L. fuscus in relation to fox predation risk at colonies across northern England and Wales in 2012. RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Bedfordshire.

Dean, T. 1990. The Natural History of Walney Island. Faust, Lancashire.

Delcourt, J., Brochier, B., Delvaux, D., Vangeluwe, D. & Poncin, P. 2022. Fox Vulpes vulpes population trends in Western Europe during and after the eradication of rabies. Mammal Review 52: 343–359. [Crossref]

Ellis, J. C., Shulman, M. J., Jessop, H., Suomala, R., Morris, S. R., Seng, V., Wagner, M. & Mach, K. 2007. Impact of raccoons on breeding success in large colonies of Great Black-backed Gulls and Herring Gulls. Waterbirds 30: 375–383. [Crossref]

Gilbert, G., Gibbons, D. W. & Evans, J. 1998. Bird monitoring methods: a manual of techniques for key UK species. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter.

Hosey, G. R. & Goodridge, F. 1980. Establishment of territories in two species of gull on Walney Island, Cumbria. Bird Study 27: 73–80. [Crossref]

Ivan, J. S. & Murphy, R. K. 2005. What preys on piping plover eggs and chicks? Wildlife Society Bulletin 33: 113–119. [Crossref]

JNCC 2021. Seabird Population Trends and Causes of Change: 1986–2019 Report. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

Laidlaw, R. A. 2021. Predator management for breeding waders: a review of current evidence and priority knowledge gaps. Wader Study 128. [Crossref]

Lloyd, C., Tasker, M. L., Partridge, K. & Brockie, K. 1991. The status of seabirds in Britain and Ireland. Poyser, London.

Minsky, D. 1980. Preventing fox predation at a Least Tern colony with an electric fence. Journal of Field Ornithology 51: 180–181.

Mitchell, F. S. 1892. The Birds of Lancashire. Gurney & Jackson, London.

Mitchell, P. I., Newton, S. F., Ratcliffe, N. & Dunn, T. E. (eds) 2004. Seabird population Britain and Ireland: Results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998 - 2002). Christopher Helm, London.

Moseby, K. E. & Read, J. L. 2006. The efficacy of feral cat, fox and rabbit exclusion fence designs for threatened species protection. Biological Conservation 127: 429–437. [Crossref]

Norris, M. & Raven, C. 2011. A study into productivity levels amongst the mixed ground nesting colony at South Walney. Cumbria Wildlife Trust & Walney Bird Observatory.

OpenDroneMap Authors 2020. ODM - A command line toolkit to generate maps, point clouds, 3D models and DEMs from drone, balloon or kite images. OpenDroneMap.

Oro, D., Cam, E., Pradel, R. & Martínez-Abraín, A. 2004. Influence of food availability on demography and local population dynamics in a long-lived seabird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271: 387–396. [Crossref]

Pons, J-M. 1992. Effects of changes in the availability of human refuse on breeding parameters in a Herring Gull Larus argentatus population in Brittany, France. Ardea 80: 143–150.

QGIS Development Team 2022. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.

Robert, H. C. & Ralph, C. J. 1975. Effects of human disturbance on the breeding success of gulls. The Condor 77: 495. [Crossref]

Robley, A., Purdey, D., Johnston, M., Lindeman, M., Busana, F. & Long, K. 2007. Experimental trials to determine effective fence designs for feral cat and fox exclusion. Ecological Management & Restoration 8: 193–198. [Crossref]

Rush, G. P. Clarke, L. E., Stone, M. & Wood, M. J. 2018. Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony-nesting seabirds. Ecology and Evolution 8: 12322–12334. [Crossref]

Smith, H. E. 1864. Other notes on the birds which breed upon Walney and adjacent islands. The Zoologist 22: 9321–9323.

Smith, R. K., Pullin, A .S., Stewart, G. B. & Sutherland, W. J. 2011. Is nest predator exclusion an effective strategy for enhancing bird populations? Biological Conservation 144: 1–10. [Crossref]

Southern, W. E., Patton, S. R., Southern, L. K. & Hanners, L. A. 1985. Effects of nine years of fox predation on two species of breeding gulls. The Auk 102: 827–833. [Crossref]

Spear, K. A., Schweitzer, S. H., Goodloe, R. & Harris, D. C. 2007. Effects of management strategies on the reproductive success of Least Terns on dredge spoil in Georgia. Southeastern Naturalist 6: 27–34. [Crossref]

White, G., Hirons, G. J. M. 2019. Guidance on the use of predator exclusion fences to reduce mammalian predation on ground-nestling birds on RSPB reserves. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy.